Skip to toolbar

I’m saving her for Ginsburg’: who is Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s likely supreme court pick?


US supreme court

‘I’m saving her for Ginsburg’: who is Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s likely supreme court pick?

Progressives fear the judge reportedly close to being picked to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg will reverse abortion rights. Friends and colleagues say a focus on her religion is unfair

Soo Youn in Washington

Mon 21 Sep 2020 01.00 EDTLast modified on Mon 21 Sep 2020 01.02 EDT

Shares11

Amy Coney Barrett, in a picture provided by Notre Dame Law School.
 Amy Coney Barrett, in a picture provided by Notre Dame Law School. Photograph: Julian Velasco/AFP/Getty Images

When Christine Baglow moved from New Orleans to South Bend, Indiana, two years ago, she found herself at a dinner party with a woman with a formidable resume: former supreme court clerk, professor at Notre Dame Law School, a judge on the US district court of appeals for the seventh circuit.

Second Republican senator says there should be no supreme court vote before election

 Read more

The woman was Amy Coney Barrett, and she and Baglow had mutual friends.

The judge came across as “tremendously friendly”, Baglow said. “I found her a very gracious and very thoughtful person. Very kind and authentic.

“I probably had the least degrees or education of anyone at that table, but to be courteously listened to and have my opinion sought, particularly on things related to kids and teens, I thought was very nice.”

Baglow, 49, is director of youth ministry at St Joseph Catholic Church in South Bend, which Barrett and her family attend.

“Not everyone with her level of education responds that way to people and she definitely did,” Baglow said.

It’s been disorienting to see the smartest person I know reduced to how she might vote on one issueAlex Blair

Now, as America absorbs news of the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, amid frenzied speculation over who will replace the liberal justice and when, Barrett’s name has come to the fore.

Donald Trump tweeted that he would select Ginsburg’s replacement “without delay”, then said he would select a woman.

But the presidential election is on 3 November and early voting has started. In a bitterly divided country, Senate Republicans’ rush to fill the supreme court vacancy has become yet another lightning rod. On Sunday, the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, called Trump’s plan to immediately fill Ginsburg’s seat an “abuse of power”.Advertisementhttps://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

Barrett has some experience of the storm. She was on Trump’s list of possible nominees in 2018, when he was considering who would replace Anthony Kennedy, a justice who retired. But the president had other plans for Barrett.

“I’m saving her for Ginsburg,” Trump said, according to an Axios report last year.

In Barrett, 48, conservatives see a young, strict constructionist who interprets the constitution through what she thinks its writers intended – a jurist in the mold of Antonin Scalia, the conservative justice (and close friend of Ginsburg), who died in February 2016 and for whom Barrett clerked.

That the devout Catholic mother of seven – she and her husband, Jesse M Barrett, have five biological children and adopted two from Haiti – is seen as a potential successor to Ginsburg has raised concerns among progressives. Many fear that if confirmed on the bench, Barrett would vote to overturn Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling which safeguards the right to abortion.

Barrett opposes abortion. And she has already fielded questions about her faith and its role in how she views the law.

During a 2017 confirmation hearing, Senator Dianne Feinstein of California commented: “The dogma lives loudly in you.”

Some said the remark was discriminatory against Catholics. But some who know Barrett said the line of questioning went to the heart of what makes her a good candidate for the supreme court, as her responses showed a dispassionate temperament and calm demeanor.https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

“Some of the senators raised the question of whether her religious convictions might affect the way she interprets the law,” said a colleague, Notre Dame law professor Paolo G Carozza. “I just found it, to be honest, kind of laughable.

“Knowing her as well as I do and having seen the way she operates, the only way in which her religious convictions are going to affect what she does as a judge is that they give her the humility to say, ‘What I do is all about the law and all about interpreting the law and the basic values of upholding the rule of law and the legal system and nothing else.’”https://www.youtube.com/embed/qze13ssb92w?embed_config=%7B%22relatedChannels%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22adsConfig%22%3A%7B%22adTagParameters%22%3A%7B%22iu%22%3A%22%2F59666047%2Ftheguardian.com%2Flaw%2Farticle%2Fng%22%2C%22cust_params%22%3A%22sens%253Df%2526permutive%253D26817%252C23527%252C25469%252C25465%252C25470%252C32030%252C24630%252C24663%252C24668%252C33793%2526pv%253Dkfc5xk3o8gxriho3ln8v%2526bp%253Ddesktop%2526si%253Df%2526ab%253DSignInGateMainControl-main-control-1%252CdotcomRenderingControl-control%252ColdTlsSupportDeprecationControl-control%2526fr%253D6-9%2526cc%253DUS%2526s%253Dlaw%2526rp%253Ddotcom-platform%2526dcre%253Df%2526inskin%253Df%2526urlkw%253Damy%252Cconey%252Cbarrett%252Cruth%252Cbader%252Cginsburg%252Csupreme%252Ccourt%252Ctrump%2526rdp%253Dt%2526consent_tcfv2%253Dna%2526cmp_interaction%253Dna%2526ct%253Darticle%2526co%253Dsoo-youn%2526url%253D%25252Flaw%25252F2020%25252Fsep%25252F21%25252Famy-coney-barrett-ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-trump%2526su%253D4%252C5%2526edition%253Dus%2526tn%253Dfeatures%2526p%253Dng%2526k%253Drepublicans%252Claw-us%252Cworld%252Cus-congress%252Cus-elections-2020%252Cus-politics%252Cus-senate%252Cus-supreme-court%252Ctrump-administration%252Creligion%252Cdonaldtrump%252Cruth-bader-ginsberg%252Cus-constitution-and-civil-liberties%2526sh%253Dhttps%25253A%25252F%25252Fgu.com%25252Fp%25252Fepzjt%2526pa%253Df%22%7D%7D%7D&enablejsapi=1&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com&widgetid=1Play Video3:05 Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Republicans and Democrats draw battle lines over replacement – video

As Barrett’s star has risen, the media and Democrats’ focus on her views on abortion has frustrated others in the Notre Dame community. Former student Alex Blair, now an attorney at the Chicago firm Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, referred the Guardian to a comment he gave to the South Bend Tribune.

 Rushing to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, McConnell shows power trumps principle

Robert Reich

Robert Reich

 Read more

“It’s been disorienting to see the smartest person I know reduced to how she might vote on one issue when she is so much more than that,” he said in 2018.

Carozza remembers Barrett as a top law student when he came on to faculty at Notre Dame in 1996. He said he found such questioning from Senate Democrats unfair, in that Barrett does not write her religion into her opinions and is not one to proselytize.

“I don’t think it’s unfair to question someone who’s a judicial appointee about their religious beliefs,” he said. “If someone says, ‘I’m going to interpret the law according to what the Qur’an says or what the Bible says,’ that’s something that in our republic we wouldn’t want.

“What makes it unfair in her case is that it was asserted on solely on the basis of knowing that she is a religious person, rather than any evidence in the things that she’s written or in the way that she behaved that might interfere with the administration of the law.”

Democracy is in peril …

… ahead of this year’s US election. Donald Trump is busy running the largest misinformation campaign in history as he questions the legitimacy of voting by mail, a method that will be crucial to Americans casting their vote in a pandemic. Meanwhile, the president has also appointed a new head of the US Postal Service who has stripped it of resources, undermining its ability to fulfill a crucial role in processing votes.

This is one of a number of attempts to suppress the votes of Americans – something that has been a stain on US democracy for decades. The Voting Rights Act was passed 55 years ago to undo a web of restrictions designed to block Black Americans from the ballot box. Now, seven years after that law was gutted by the supreme court, the president is actively threatening a free and fair election.

Through our Fight to vote project, the Guardian has pledged to put voter suppression at the center of our 2020 coverage. This election will impact every facet of American life. But it will not be a genuine exercise in democracy if American voters are stopped from participating in it.

At a time like this, an independent news organisation that fights for truth and holds power to account is not just optional. It is essential. Like many other news organisations, the Guardian has been significantly impacted by the pandemic. We rely to an ever greater extent on our readers, both for the moral force to continue doing journalism at a time like this and for the financial strength to facilitate that reporting.

You’ve read more than 8 articles in the last year. We believe every one of us deserves equal access to fact-based news and analysis. We’ve decided to keep Guardian journalism free for all readers, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay. This is made possible thanks to the support we receive from readers across America in all 50 states.

As our business model comes under even greater pressure, we’d love your help so that we can carry on our essential work. If you can, support the Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.Support The Guardian

Accepted payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express  Paypal, Diners Club and Discover

Topics

Advertisement

Read The
Guardian without
interruption on all
your devices

Subscribe now

most viewed in US

https://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

Related stories

Most popular

Steve Bell’s If … celebrating one whole year of government delivery‘Quite frankly terrifying’: How the QAnon conspiracy theory is taking root in the UK

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial
error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)

RSS
Follow by Email
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Share
Scroll to Top